12/25/2012
Obviously,
in the wake of the school shooting in Connecticut, gun control issue has been
brought to the forefront of people’s minds.
Some are clamoring to discuss how best to protect kids, while others are
more fearful about protecting their guns.
These people have their priorities a bit mixed up.
The
issue isn’t guns themselves but the people that use them and shouldn’t. In the wake of the shooting, there have been
a lot of pro gun folks posting pictures and quotes about how it’s people, not
guns. This is partly right. Gun control is more about people than guns
anyway. The entire idea is not to force
people to turn in their weapons in some sort of totalitarian move by the
government but to keep better track of who has what and yes, in some cases,
limit who can have weapons. I don’t
think there are many people who argue that the mentally ill should be allowed
to keep weapons. I have talked to many
hunters who share the belief that assault weapons and 30 round clips are unnecessary
for hunting. Sen. Joe Manchin of West
Virginia recently came out saying exactly that.
Sen. Manchin has received the top grade awarded to elected officials by
the NRA, so him saying this is no small thing.
We need common sense regulation that can ensure that each weapon can be
traced as well. These regulations need
to ensure that the wrong people cannot acquire firearms. I have some ideas of what these should
entail, but that can come later. This
post is just an introduction and I would like to go into more detail on
specifics at a later time.
Anyone
that freaks out about Obama coming to take their guns away is either stupid or
not paying attention. The current
proposal by Senator Feinstein (D-CA) is based on the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban,
which she and then Senator Joe Biden shepherded through Congress. The 1994 law, and the bill that Sen.
Feinstein is proposing will have a grandfather clause. This clause says that if you are in legal
possession of a firearm when the law comes into effect, then it will be legal
for you to own said firearm despite the law that will make it illegal to
possess. It is important to note that it
is the gun itself that would be grandfathered in and not the owner’s right to own
an assault weapon.
In
addition to the actual gun control laws and conversation, a separate but
related conversation needs to be had about mental illness in this country. Too many of the mass shootings in recent
years have been people that have had some sort of mental illness and nothing was
done about it. The shooting at Von Maur
in Omaha, NE was committed by someone, who was described by officials in the
wake of the shooting, that “fell through the cracks” of the mental health
system of Nebraska. There are too many
cases like this. This is a serious
problem and needs thoughtful study and discussion to get right.
There
have been congressmen, pundits, and posts on Facebook that seem to think having
more guns in each school is the answer.
I have seen posts that say almost every public shooting has taken place
in places where people are not supposed to carry weapons. More guns in more places is not an acceptable
solution. We are living in the 21st
century, not the old west. I am part of
the crowd that wants to treat the roots of the problem, while these people seem
to want to turn our modern society into a Mad Max movie.
The
time to discuss this is now, not later.
Gun advocates and pundits are quick to jump on anyone that wants to have
a conversation on these topics in the wake of a tragedy. They say it is too soon. They appeal to the feelings of the
grieving. Well, it is never too soon. This is something that should have been
addressed a long time ago and we have a lot of catching up to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment